Connect with us


A Watch Odyssey. Or Not.



In the tradition-bound world of Swiss watchmaking, H. Moser & Cie stands out as something of an enfant terrible.

In 2016, it created the Swiss Alp Watch, a look-alike sendup of the Apple Watch that poked fun at the Swiss industry’s reaction to smartwatches. A year later, the company unveiled — and within days hastily withdrew — its Swiss Icons watch, a mash-up of design clichés that seemed to take a swipe at some well-known brands, including Rolex, Panerai and Audemars Piguet.

Being disruptive — bringing “a little sexiness to the brand,” as Edouard Meylan, the company’s chief executive, said last year in an Esquire interview — is what Moser is all about these days.

Now it has taken a similar approach to marketing its new Pioneer Centre Seconds Funky Blue Black Edition: Enlisting two fans to kick off “The Pioneer Tour,” a yearlong odyssey just made for Instagram.

In mid-July, the brand gave watches to the two men, one based in Thailand and the other in Texas, asking them to post some destination photos to #pioneertour and then hand the 42.8-millimeter sport timepieces (in black carbon-treated steel) to someone — anyone — of their choosing.

“Social media is about interaction,” Mr. Meylan said. “Not just feeding people images.”

The Thai fan was Arunsakh Sachamuneewongse, an insurance broker who in 2015 created an Instagram account, @Moserlover, dedicated to the brand’s minimalist timepieces. One of his photos showed the Pioneer watch against Bangkok’s skyline at sunrise.

In Texas, the choice was Brett Rutledge (@tick_tock3940), the head of a Houston-based steel distribution company. He said he thought carefully about photo settings and, to honor the 50th anniversary of the moon landing, wore the watch to NASA’s Space Center Houston to capture a few shots of the timepiece framed by rockets and spacesuits.

“The idea of the Pioneer is the spirit of adventure,” he said.

Just one problem: As of the end of August, neither watch had crossed an international border, even though each had been in the custody of six different people by that time. (This does not count a pit stop that Mr. Sachamuneewongse made in London after picking up the watch at H. Moser’s home base of Schaffhausen, Switzerland.)

“We all want to see it go all over the place,” Mr. Rutledge said. “Man, we’ve got to get this thing out of Texas.”

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Are Homemade Pregnancy Tests Safe Or No?




In a YouTube video with more than 1.7 million views (and very low production value), chimey music plays as the camera zooms in on a dish of sugar and then a plastic cup of…pee. It’s labeled “not pregnant.” Then, a second glass of urine from a pregs woman appears. A gloved hand holds up the “not-pregnant” sample to the camera and mixes in three spoonfuls of sugar for 30 seconds. A minute later, the sugar is dissolved and the liquid looks the same. The mysterious gloved hand repeats the process with the “pregnant” pee, and bubbles appear at the top of the substance. In summary, sugar + pregnant pee = bubbly pee. Thus, pregnancy confirmed. Right? Eh, not quite.

What’s a homemade pregnancy test?

The homemade sugar pregnancy test is just one of a handful of DIY conception confirmations that involve mixing pee with household items like bleach, toothpaste, and (obvi) sugar in hopes of causing a chemical reaction to determine whether or not you’re growing an alien inside of you.

Buying a pregnancy test IRL can be awkward. So it makes sense that people would be intrigued by a DIY option. But if you’re going to handle your own pee, you want it to work—and I’m sorry to report that’s not the case.

How does a homemade pregnancy test work?

In each of these tests, users add the substance (bleach, sugar, toothpaste) to their pee and wait for a reaction. The theory is that these products are sensitive to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone present only in the urine and blood of pregnant women, which causes a chemical change when they interact.

Fans of the DIY method claim that if the bleach or sugar mix becomes fizzy or bubbly, you’re pregnant. The same goes for the toothpaste, which allegedly gets frothy (and sometimes turns bluish). If there’s no reaction it means you are not with child, per the DIY pregnancy test community.

Are homemade pregnancy tests accurate?

Sorry, nope. There haven’t been any formal studies to indicate that homemade pregnancy tests can actually detect hCG or any other specific marker of pregnancy in urine—and it’s highly unlikely future studies would prove otherwise, says Kelsey Tyssowski, PhD, a biology researcher at Harvard University.

“I don’t see any reason why adding bleach, sugar, or toothpaste to urine would specifically detect that hCG,” adds Brianne Raccor, PhD, assistant professor of pharmaceutical sciences at Campbell University.

So if the DIY tests aren’t legit, what’s up with these chemical reactions on YouTube? Well, it might have something to do with the pH levels, the measure of acidity or alkalinity in a solution, of the pee samples and the things they’re combined with, explains Tyssowski.

“If you mix an acid and a base, there’s going to be some kind of chemical reaction,” she says. And since bleach and toothpaste are more alkaline, mixing them with some acidic pee could make the fluid foamy. As for the sugar, which is a solid and has no pH, Raccor says it’s unclear why the two urine samples would lead to a different result. “There’s no control for temperature, urine amount, or the amount of sugar used in the video, all of which could affect the outcome,” she says. She adds that if the non-pregnant sample dissolved less sugar, for any reason, that could account for the bubbles you see in the video. So… ¯_(ツ)_/¯


Pregnancy Test

First Response

Are homemade pregnancy tests safe?

Besides the potential hazards of working with bleach (ya know, fumes and possible skin and eye irritation), creating a homemade pregnancy test isn’t dangerous. The biggest risk is trusting the result you get with these very unreliable tests, says Raccor.

For this reason, you’re better off going with a store-bought test, explains Alyssa Dweck, MD, an ob-gyn in Westchester County, New York. “The FDA-approved tests you find in a drugstore are proven to be reliable, uniform, reproducible, safe, and effective,” she adds. Also, they’re 99 percent effective, according to Planned Parenthood, which is way more than those rando concoctions.

If you’re worried about the cost of a real-deal test, you can save some money by buying a generic one, says Dweck. They work exactly the same as the brand-name versions, she adds. Planned Parenthood may also be able to provide a free pregnancy test depending on where you live. Whatever you choose, just know these kitchen science experiment tests aren’t gonna cut it.

Source link

Continue Reading


Recreating My Ugliest Outfits from High School



Roasting my own ugly outfits and dressing like I did in high school! In this style swap, I’m recreating my ugliest outfits from high school. I’ve worn the ugliest clothes from fashion nova, styled clothes I hate for a week, and worn ugly clothes from dollskill… but this time it’s all my fault lol.

Recreating Celebrity Photos
I Styled Clothes I Hate for a Week
Styling the Ugliest Clothes from Dollskill

❤ Check out the newest episode of my podcast, Sierra Unfiltered

❤ I HAVE MERCH! Shop my clothing line

❤ This video was edited by Rachel Resnick!

Shop My Equipment//


Shop My Favorites//
UBER CODE FOR $20 OFF: sierras2308ue

Follow Me//

Vlog Channel
Podcast Channel

Hey! My name is Sierra Schultzzie and I make 2 new videos every week about Curvy Fashion, Curvy Hacks, DIY Projects, and Disney! People also know me as Sierra Schultz or Sierra Schultzie!

FTC: This video is NOT sponsored. Some links may be affiliate.

❤ ATTENTION COMPANIES: If you are a company interested in working with me, please contact me here:


Continue Reading


Jennifer Lopez stuns in updated version of her green Versace gown




Jennifer Lopez just proved that she can still stun in a sexy, green Versace gown.

The singer and actress closed the fashion house’s runway show Friday during Milan Fashion Week by wearing an updated version of the iconic dress she wore for the 2000 Grammy Awards. You know, the one that was such a big deal it prompted the creation of Google Images.

For a refresher on just how long ago that was, Lopez was dating Sean “Diddy” Combs, although he was still called “Puff Daddy,” and Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera were both nominated for Best New Artist (Aguilera pulled out the win). So it’s been a minute.

Jennifer Lopez wears the iconic green Versace gown at the 42nd Annual Grammy Awards on Feb. 23, 2000, at Staples Center in L.A. (Photo: Scott Gries/ImageDirect)

But Hustlers star J.Lo, who turned 50 in July, looked as amazing as ever, truly, in the new take on her iconic dress, which revealed even more skin than the original.

The audience was enthralled. Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour had “an uncharacteristic grin on her face,” as she joined the crowd in giving the singer a standing ovation, the New York Post’s Page Six reported.

The “On the Floor” singer had been spotted shopping in Italy the day before her runway appearance, and the Versace invite featured a jungle theme, which reportedly caused speculation that Lopez would make an appearance.

Sure enough, J.Lo walked down the runway solo, oozing confidence the entire walk, before returning to the stage with designer Donatella Versace.

While the people watching Lopez in action stood to applaud her and snap photos of the memorable moment, fans everywhere quickly took to Twitter. Actress Katharine McPhee was one of the first to share her excitement.

Read more from Yahoo Entertainment:

Want daily pop culture news delivered to your inbox? Sign up here for Yahoo Entertainment & Lifestyle’s newsletter.

Source link

Continue Reading


We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.